What Does ‘FG’ Or ‘MFG’ On An Nvidia Graphics Card Really Imply?

Learn extra at:





When Nvidia unveiled its RTX 50-series graphics playing cards at CES in January this yr, the corporate talked about some fascinating numbers: 240 FPS (frames per second) in “Cyberpunk 2077.” Nevertheless, this was not from a flagship GPU costing greater than $1500, however from its mid-range graphic card priced round $800. That is as a result of this mid-range graphics card was leveraging Nvidia’s Body Technology (FG) and Multi Body Technology (MFG). 

Nvidia used CES to showcase the efficiency advantages of its new DLSS applied sciences (Deep Studying Tremendous Sampling) on GeForce RTX GPUs, particularly the RTX 50 collection. For those who play “Name of Responsibility,” “Fortnite,” “Cyberpunk 2077,” or different graphics-intensive video games, you know the way a single stutter spoils the general gameplay expertise, whereas a split-second of enter lag can get you eradicated. A clean body charge with none latency is a should in these video games. 

Nvidia graphics playing cards do promise large FPS numbers to make video games visually smoother with the FG and MFG characteristic. Nevertheless, a piece of the gaming community is skeptical, arguing that this visible smoothness comes at the price of responsiveness, which is important in aggressive gaming.

All about Body Technology and Multi Body Technology

Body Technology is a characteristic on newer Nvidia graphic cards to generate and insert an AI-generated body between two actual frames to make movement look smoother in-game. After analyzing two actual frames, FG generates a synthetic body based mostly on its prediction to fill the hole. 

Because of these “pretend frames,” the body counter might learn 120 FPS, even when the graphics card is natively rendering the sport at 60 FPS. However, Multi Body Technology for RTX 50-series graphic playing cards, inserts as much as three AI-generated frames between two actual ones; that means a recreation operating on 60 FPS shows as much as 240 FPS with MFG.

Nvidia highlights FG/MFG in its bulletins and ads, as these FPS numbers look spectacular as compared charts, particularly for a mid-range graphics card, akin to an RTX 5070. Contemplating a flagship GPU was wanted for such efficiency earlier than the RTX playing cards, Nvidia exhibits the potential of its graphic playing cards to deal with demanding video games with body technology.

Why greater FPS shouldn’t be the complete story

Whereas body technology and multi-frame technology ship a clean visible expertise for avid gamers, these spectacular numbers do not translate to the responsiveness that truly issues in aggressive gaming. Since “pretend” frames do not carry person enter the way in which actual frames do, latency stays a key challenge in fast-paced video games. Even when the sport appears smoother at 120 or 240 FPS with FG and MFG, respectively, the sport will nonetheless solely react to your inputs on the “actual” body charge. This results in enter lag, which is why some avid gamers imagine that the efficiency metrics could be deceptive.

Nvidia graphic playing cards do characteristic Reflex know-how to attenuate system latency when Body Technology is enabled, but it surely’s solely efficient to an extent, and may’t get rid of the delay inherent within the AI body prediction course of. Nevertheless, FG and MFG options could be actually helpful for individuals who play graphics-heavy singleplayer video games like “Cyberpunk 2077,” “Pink Lifeless Redemption 2,” and so on., the place movement smoothness is price it for an immersive expertise; and the enter lag shouldn’t be a dealbreaker. However for individuals who play fast-paced, aggressive video games like “Name of Responsibility,” the place split-second reactions matter, enter lag can spoil your progress.

Because of this, some imagine that know-how like FG and MFG is changing into a substitute for recreation optimization and higher graphics {hardware}. With Nvidia, AMD, and different graphics card makers engaged on making body technology accessible in new graphic playing cards, the argument is whether or not it would enable builders to make use of DLSS and Body Technology to hit excessive body charges, versus optimization and expansive graphics settings, to focus on the next framerate.



Turn leads into sales with free email marketing tools (en)

Leave a reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here