Learn extra at:
When trying to purchase a mid-range graphics card for a gaming PC, you are in all probability selecting between the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and the Radeon RX 9060 XT, and per our suggestion, 16GB variations for each GPU fashions. In in the present day’s evaluation, we shall be evaluating these GPUs with a number of upscaling modes enabled to find out which mannequin performs greatest in lifelike gaming configurations. We all know a lot of you can be utilizing DLSS 4 on a GeForce GPU and FSR 4 on a Radeon GPU, and this evaluation contains efficiency knowledge for each.
This comparability permits us to discover a spread of vital insights. You can see each the native and upscaled FPS efficiency of those playing cards throughout varied video games, supplying you with a clearer thought of the expertise each gives.
We are going to look at whether or not DLSS 4 or FSR 4 supplies a larger efficiency uplift, and whether or not that shift impacts the general efficiency distinction between the 2 GPUs.
Additionally, you will see the influence of utilizing Balanced or Efficiency upscaling modes as an alternative of High quality, which is more and more related as fashionable upscaling applied sciences have become highly effective even at decrease settings.
The aim of this benchmarking characteristic is to offer extra knowledge and a special perspective than our preliminary day-one evaluation, which targeted totally on native efficiency at varied resolutions.
Testing a number of upscaling modes on prime of all the opposite evaluations is extraordinarily time-consuming, which is why the unique evaluation targeted on extra standardized, apples-to-apples knowledge. Now that these playing cards have been accessible for a while, it is the right alternative to dive deeper into further upscaling evaluation.
We even have a growing collection of upscaling-related content on TechSpot, which is vital background materials since DLSS 4 and FSR 4 don’t produce similar visible outputs. Because of this, efficiency testing between the 2 is just not a direct comparability.
Our in-depth options discover how these upscalers work, the visible variations between DLSS 4 and FSR 4, and the way the assorted upscaling settings examine. These are priceless companion sources that complement this performance-focused evaluation.
Take a look at Setup and System Specs
At the moment, we’re testing 15 titles at 1440p that help each DLSS 4 and FSR 4. For every recreation, we’re evaluating the three principal upscaling modes: High quality, Balanced, and Efficiency. This, along with native TAA. The TAA output is visually similar on each playing cards, serving as a constant reference level.
DLSS 4 is used on the RTX 5060 Ti, whereas FSR 4 is used on the RX 9060 XT. On the GeForce card, most titles have been upgraded to DLSS 4 utilizing the motive force override characteristic, which ensures the most recent upscaling mannequin is in use. A couple of titles have native DLSS 4 help; in these instances, the transformer mannequin is chosen in-game and the most recent mannequin is enabled within the driver.
On the Radeon card, all video games are configured to make use of FSR 4 by way of the motive force software program toggle.
We’re lucky to have the Asus Prime fashions of each the 5060 Ti 16GB and the 9060 XT 16GB for this testing. This provides a priceless real-world ingredient to the comparability, as these are supposed to be equal fashions from the identical model.
The Prime is Asus’ mid-range providing – higher than the Twin sequence, however beneath the TUF Gaming line. Each playing cards are manufacturing unit overclocked to related ranges and have related coolers and designs. Whereas not similar, they’re comparable in high quality and pricing.
The Prime 5060 Ti 16GB is presently priced at $530, a $100 premium over its $430 MSRP. The Prime 9060 XT 16GB is priced at $440, a $90 premium over the $350 MSRP. These are vital markups, however they mirror the present state of the GPU market, the place neither mannequin is usually accessible at its MSRP.
Our take a look at system features a Ryzen 7 9800X3D CPU, 32GB of DDR5-6000 CL30 reminiscence, and the most recent recreation updates, Home windows patches, and drivers. We’re utilizing driver model 577.00 for Nvidia and 25.6.3 for AMD.
Let’s get into the outcomes.
Benchmarks
Horizon Zero Daybreak
Beginning with Horizon Zero Daybreak Remastered, there may be little or no distinction between the 2 fashions at native 1440p. These margins stay comparatively unchanged when upscaling is utilized. The RTX 5060 Ti is 3% quicker utilizing native TAA, 1% quicker with High quality upscaling, 2% quicker with Balanced, and once more 2% quicker with Efficiency. All of those variations fall inside what we contemplate a tie. On each GPUs, High quality upscaling supplies a 19% efficiency uplift at 1440p utilizing the very best in-game preset.
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Aside
Ratchet & Clank: Rift Aside is kind of playable on these mid-range GPUs, even whereas utilizing the very best preset with ray tracing set to Excessive. On this configuration, the GeForce GPU is 14% quicker throughout all upscaling settings. Regardless of the 5060 Ti’s benefit in ray tracing, the 9060 XT nonetheless delivers playable efficiency. With FSR 4 set to High quality, it achieves a median of 75 FPS, which is stable for this kind of recreation.
The Final of Us Half I
In The Last of Us Part I, each graphics playing cards carry out equally utilizing the Extremely preset. At native 1440p, the GeForce card leads by 3%, which will increase barely to 4% with High quality upscaling. Curiously, the margin widens at decrease upscaling modes, the place DLSS 4 on the 5060 Ti is 6 to 7% quicker. FSR 4 does not scale as nicely on this title, though Balanced mode nonetheless gives a 37% uplift over native TAA, in comparison with 42% for DLSS 4.
Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
In Spider-Man 2, examined with the Very Excessive preset and Very Excessive ray tracing, the GeForce GPU begins with a modest 5% lead at native 1440p. This benefit will increase with upscaling: DLSS 4 boosts efficiency by 49% on the 5060 Ti, whereas FSR 4 improves efficiency by solely 33% on the 9060 XT. Because of this, the 5060 Ti extends its result in 16% with High quality upscaling and 20% with Balanced. Each playing cards attain a 60 FPS common with upscaling, although the GeForce card is clearly quicker.
The Final of Us Half II
The Final of Us Half II reveals related common efficiency between the GPUs at native 1440p, though the 9060 XT supplies larger 1% lows. When upscaling is enabled, the 5060 Ti scales barely higher, displaying a 5 to 7% efficiency lead on common. Nonetheless, in 1% lows, the 2 fashions are evenly matched within the examined space.
Ghost of Tsushima
Ghost of Tsushima is likely one of the extra favorable titles for the Radeon GPU. The 9060 XT is a number of % quicker in all examined configurations, though the variations are minor. Total, each playing cards ship easy and extremely playable efficiency with no uncommon scaling conduct.
Stalker 2: Coronary heart of Chornobyl
Stalker 2 is an easy case. The RTX 5060 Ti begins with a 7% efficiency lead, which stays constant inside some extent or two when upscaling is utilized. The Epic preset at 1440p could be demanding, and each playing cards battle in essentially the most intense scenes. The 5060 Ti hits a 60 FPS common with High quality upscaling, whereas the 9060 XT requires Balanced mode. Having 16GB of VRAM is vital to succeed in this efficiency degree, as famous in our day-one evaluation.
Marvel Rivals
Marvel Rivals performs higher on the RTX 5060 Ti with the Extremely preset, providing 12% larger efficiency at native 1440p and 11% extra with High quality upscaling. Nonetheless, at decrease upscaling modes, the Radeon card closes the hole. Balanced mode reveals a 7% lead for the GeForce GPU, and simply 6% with Efficiency. For precise gameplay, lowering the preset from Extremely is beneficial, as neither card supplies distinctive efficiency with upscaling enabled.
Kingdom Come: Deliverance II
Kingdom Come: Deliverance II behaves equally to Spider-Man 2, regardless of utilizing a special recreation engine. At native 1440p, the margin is just 3% in favor of the 5060 Ti. However with High quality upscaling, the GeForce card turns into 36% quicker, whereas the Radeon solely improves by 28%. This ends in the 5060 Ti being over 10% quicker with upscaling and capable of surpass 100 FPS utilizing Balanced mode.
Star Wars Outlaws
Star Wars Outlaws presents the alternative pattern. At native 1440p, the 5060 Ti leads by 7%, however with High quality upscaling, the 9060 XT pulls forward. The Radeon sees a forty five% acquire from FSR 4, in comparison with simply 22% for the GeForce GPU. This swings the efficiency result in 10% in favor of the 9060 XT. Nonetheless, the benefit shrinks when utilizing Balanced or Efficiency modes.
Hunt: Showdown
Hunt: Showdown performs poorly on Radeon GPUs, a pattern we noticed beforehand with the RX 9070 XT. At native 1440p, the 5060 Ti is 45% quicker. Even with High quality upscaling, the hole stays at 29%. FSR 4 Efficiency solely manages to match DLSS 4 High quality, and the 9060 XT struggles to exceed 60 FPS. AMD might want to present additional optimization for this title, regardless of present FSR 4 help.
God of Warfare: Ragnarok
God of War: Ragnarok runs nicely on each GPUs. Our take a look at targets one of the crucial demanding sections of the sport, which does scale back 1% lows. Common FPS is comparable between the 2 playing cards throughout native and upscaled modes, however the 9060 XT delivers noticeably higher 1% lows on this particular space.
Stellar Blade
Stellar Blade is one other title the place the 9060 XT underperforms. At native 1440p, the GeForce card is 29% quicker, and this margin will increase barely with upscaling. In 1% lows, the variations are much more stark, particularly within the intense seaside scene crammed with fireplace results. With High quality upscaling, the 5060 Ti achieves 55% larger 1% lows. That is one other recreation the place AMD may gain advantage from further tuning.
F1 25
The ultimate title is F1 25. That is one other case the place the Radeon card catches up when upscaling is used. At native 1440p with the Extremely Excessive preset (together with ray tracing), the 5060 Ti is 9% quicker. Nonetheless, with High quality upscaling, each GPUs ship the identical common body fee. Nonetheless, 1% lows stay stronger on the GeForce card. The 5060 Ti goes from being 28% quicker in 1% lows natively to 14% quicker with High quality upscaling.
Efficiency Abstract
Listed here are the typical outcomes throughout the 15 examined video games, calculated utilizing a geometrical imply. What stands out is that, though we noticed a spread of outcomes with upscaling – generally the 5060 Ti gained extra floor, different instances the 9060 XT did – on common, the efficiency margins between the 2 GPUs stay constant.
On this pattern of 15 video games, we discovered that the 5060 Ti 16GB was 9% quicker on common at native 1440p. With High quality upscaling, it was 10% quicker, then once more 10% quicker utilizing Balanced upscaling, and 9% quicker utilizing Efficiency upscaling.
That is excellent news for individuals who selected both card primarily based on our day-one benchmarks, which targeted on native rendering. In real-world situations the place DLSS 4 or FSR 4 is used, the relative efficiency hole between the 2 fashions doesn’t change meaningfully. After all, one might argue that picture high quality varies between DLSS 4 and FSR 4, and in some titles, High quality vs Balanced would possibly really feel nearer subjectively, however when evaluating the identical upscaling modes, the margins are constant.
This additionally means the standard efficiency uplift from enabling upscaling is comparable throughout each GPUs. On common, High quality mode offered a 30% improve over native rendering, Balanced delivered about 45%, and Efficiency added roughly 55%. These outcomes come from video games that run at roughly 60 FPS natively.
On common, High quality mode upscaling offered a 30% improve over native rendering, Balanced delivered about 45%, and Efficiency added roughly 55%.
You possibly can count on a bigger uplift if the baseline FPS is decrease and a smaller one if the baseline is larger. Dropping from High quality to Balanced yields a few 10% acquire, which we contemplate the minimal acceptable setting for gaming at 1440p utilizing both DLSS 4 or FSR 4. Efficiency mode supplies an extra 8 to 9% increase however comes with extra noticeable visible compromises.
You might have seen these outcomes are extra favorable to the RTX 5060 Ti in comparison with our day-one review of the 9060 XT, the place the 5060 Ti was simply 1% quicker on common at 1440p. That is nearly completely as a result of recreation choice on this evaluation, which focuses solely on titles that help each DLSS 4 and FSR 4.
The present pattern contains video games that carry out considerably higher on GeForce GPUs, equivalent to Murderer’s Creed Shadows and Stellar Blade, which weren’t a part of our preliminary protection. Sadly, a number of the stronger titles for Radeon, like Name of Obligation: Black Ops 6, couldn’t be included as they don’t but help DLSS 4.
Takeaways and Shopping for Suggestions
In the end, these outcomes don’t considerably alter our total evaluation of the GeForce RTX 5060 Ti and Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB. With upscaling enabled, the efficiency margins stay in step with what we noticed in native rendering exams, so there isn’t any motive to regulate our earlier suggestions.
One other encouraging takeaway is that upscaling permits extremely playable efficiency in a lot of the video games we examined. In 12 out of the 15 titles examined at 1440p extremely settings, upscaling utilizing acceptable modes like High quality or Balanced delivered no less than 60 FPS within the benchmarked areas.
Most of the video games had been operating at 80 to 90 FPS utilizing High quality upscaling, which supplies an incredible expertise for a mid-range or mainstream graphics card. And that is with out utilizing body era, which many avid gamers don’t like, simply normal upscaling.
In the intervening time, the best-value possibility on this value vary stays the Radeon RX 9060 XT 16GB, which may presently be discovered for as little as $360 to $370. The GeForce RTX 5060 Ti 16GB is sometimes accessible at $450 however is extra usually priced at $480 or higher.
That makes the GeForce card roughly 25 to 35 % dearer, for at greatest a ten % efficiency benefit, as proven in the present day when evaluating High quality upscaling at 1440p. Throughout a broader set of video games, we’d count on the efficiency margin to drop into the only digits.
The extra significant distinction between these two merchandise lies not in uncooked efficiency, however within the total high quality of the upscaling know-how. DLSS 4 typically produces higher visible outcomes than FSR 4 at resolutions like 1440p, that are typical for mainstream GPUs.
Whereas FSR 4 is actually usable and has its strengths, DLSS 4 usually supplies extra constant visible stability. You possibly can be taught extra about this in our DLSS 4 vs FSR 4 feature articles.
On prime of that, Nvidia continues to supply broader upscaling recreation help. AMD has finished a good job increasing FSR 4 help, significantly in titles launched in 2025, however the whole variety of supported video games stays restricted. It additionally excludes many standard older titles that folks nonetheless play in the present day. When comparing DLSS 4 to older variations of FSR (or DLSS 3) the distinction is important. DLSS nonetheless leads by a large margin. AMD has made a promising begin with FSR 4, however there may be clearly extra work forward.